A new white paper from the Southern California Water Coalition’s Water Quality Task Force aims to help identify new and better ways for the state to use data and science in the development of state drinking water standards. This is important in light of California’s Human Right to Water Act (HRTWA) which challenges public water systems to deliver water that is clean and safe for all customers, regardless of prevailing conditions and system limitations.

The recent statewide assessments demonstrate that the way we have been managing drinking water is not working and is preventing us from reaching our goals for California’s Human Right to Water. We need to change our strategies to address the competing demands on our resources and reverse the current trends that are harming people’s health, making it harder for people to have access to clean water, and making water more expensive. 

This is especially important when setting standards for drinking water because many standards for emerging contaminants can take money away from treating water for known health threats and keeping the system running. This also often requires rate increases that make it hard for low-income households to afford, and causes self-sufficient systems to become dependent on state funding. State agencies can no longer wait until the end of the standard-setting process to consider how new drinking water standards will impact HRTWA objectives.

One way to achieve the multiple objectives of the HRTWA is by developing Public Health Goals (PHG). PHGs, or Public Health Goals, are very important when it comes to setting Maximum Contaminant Levels. The California Safe Drinking Water Act says that regulators must look at PHGs when deciding what new levels should be set for contaminants like 1,4-dioxane. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has a chance to use the latest methods and research when assessing risks to see how accurately they reflect health risks.

• Public Health Goal Science Policy White Paper, published January 2022
• Letter to California Secretary of Environmental Protection Jared Blumenfeld, sent on January 18, 2022

The post Drinking Water Standards: Using Data and Science appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

About 125 people attended our first in-person event in 18 months to hear from leaders and experts to discuss how we can not only recognize but celebrate the rich diversity of Southern California’s people and cultures and see clearly how we are all connected by the need for a safe, affordable and reliable water supply. The event took place in Ontario, California, and featured this expert panel:

• Danielle Coats, Senior Legislative Program Manager, Eastern Municipal Water District
• Anatole Falagan, Assistant General Manager, Long Beach Water Department
• Kurt Schwabe, Professor, UC Riverside
• Mayor Acquanetta Warren, City of Fontana

The post Watch On Demand: Equity, Access and Affordability in Water appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

Nearly 500 people registered for the event to hear from scientists, city and water officials and others to learn how the region and the state are addressing contamination as well as exploring alternatives to these chemicals to protect future water supplies. Our panel included:

• Robert Beste, Assistant General Manager, Water Replenishment District of Southern California
• Steven Carmona, City Manager, City of Pico Rivera, California
• Jason Dadakis, Executive Director, Water Quality and Technical Resources, Orange County Water District
• Scott Grieco, P.E. Ph.D., Global Technology Leader, Jacobs
• Craig Miller, General Manager, Western Municipal Water District
• Dan Newton, California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water
• Steve Tedesco, Senior Vice President, Tetra Tech

Interested in more resources? Here are some PFAS resources we shared during the webinar:

• The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency PFAS webpages 
• USEPA also links to PFAS information state by state 
• California State Water Boards PFAS webpages 
• Orange County Water District webpage on addressing PFOA/PFOS 
• Water Replenishment District of Southern California PFAS information webpage
• Western Municipal Water District Understanding PFOS and PFOA webpage 

You may also want to check out these files from the webinar:

• Webinar poll results
• Questions and Answers text
• Webinar chat transcript

We got terrific feedback from our participants as well. Here’s a sample:

The post Watch Water Quality Webinar Video On Demand appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

The development of treatment technologies, that can reliably, sustainably, and cost effectively remove PFAS from water and maximize the use of our water resources is a critical short-term step.

This SCWC program will explore PFAS, what it is, how we can treat the existing conditions and explore long-term solutions that replace these chemicals to ensure the protection of future generations’ access to water today and for tomorrow. Register HERE. 

Panelists:

• Robert Beste, Assistant General Manager, Water Replenishment District of Southern California
• Steven Carmona, City Manager, City of Pico Rivera, California
• Jason Dadakis, Executive Director, Water Quality and Technical Resources, Orange County Water District
• Scott Grieco, P.E. Ph.D., Global Technology Leader, Jacobs
• Craig Miller, General Manager, Western Municipal Water District
• Dan Newton, California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water
• Steve Tedesco, Senior Vice President, Tetra Tech

Webinar Sponsors:

• Jacobs
• Tetra Tech
• SL Environmental Group
• AqueoUS Vets
• Black & Veatch
• Calgon
• CDM Smith
• HDR
• Pacific Hydro
• Stantec

Founding Sponsors:

• County of San Bernardino
• Inland Empire Utilities Agency
• Irvine Ranch Water District
• Los Angeles County Public Works
• Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
• Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
• Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• West Basin Municipal Water District

The post Register for SCWC’s Water Quality Matters Webinar appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

Let’s be honest, we are all hoping for a better and brighter 2021. Each new year brings the promise of a fresh start. It also marks a perfect time to step back and reaffirm what we want from the next 12 months. Here are my six resolutions for California water moving forward.

Resolution #1: We will maximize every drop to its best and highest use.

Water is vital to our quality of life now and in the future. It’s an essential resource increasingly threatened by the devastating impacts of climate change, and we must collectively work to preserve and protect it for future generations. This means making the most out of every drop we have through stormwater capture, water recycling and reuse, conservation and more.

Southern California has long been a leader in proactively finding flexible and efficient solutions like these, from our robust water conservation programs to our investments in local and regional projects to increase regional self-sufficiency. However, water recycled, groundwater storage and recharge, conservation and stormwater capture projects work in close concert with the stable, baseline supply that the State Water Project provides, helping to double or triple the SWP’s benefits. While we continue to increase our local supplies, SWP water remains an essential source for the state and region.

Resolution #2: Water is California’s issue to solve, not a regional issue for blame.

Building a resilient, statewide water supply portfolio for every Californian means recognizing the unique needs and challenging of each region as well as the power of the collective in charting a path forward. Pitting the northern part of the state against the southern part is the old binary–as water policy expert Timothy J. Quinn said during our “History Matters” webinar in June, this kind of adversarial decision-making process creates a winner-takes-all mentality that locks parties in fighting mode and makes the courtroom the policy forum. Instead, let’s aim for a collaborative process that involves public agencies and stakeholders working together in an open and transparent process, understanding that “collaboration is really hard,” as Quinn said.

Resolution #3: State and Federal Legislators from Southern California will understand more fully where their water comes from.

Water drives California’s economy, sustains our environment, and provides for our unique and treasured quality of life. Yet ask many people where our water supplies come from, and you might get a joking response “from the kitchen tap.” In fact, our water comes from rain and snow, most of which falls in the northern part of the state, while most of our population resides in the southern part of the state. Over the years, water resource development (moving water to where it was needed) has enabled our state to become an economic powerhouse and top agricultural producer while supporting critical eco-systems. 

The conviction that water will always just come out of the kitchen tap is not one we should take for granted. Recurring drought cycles, the impacts of climate change, the risk of earthquakes, and aging infrastructure may restrict our ability to meet future demands for a reliable, high quality and affordable water supply. SCWC sees our job this year as to equip its members, legislators and policymakers who represent us with the tools and knowledge needed to stay informed and active in promoting a secure water future. We must meet people where they are and share what we know about the importance of water to the California way of life as well as the urgent need to take action now to shore up a resilient water supply for all Californians. Count on us this year as we continue to produce resources and programming aimed at keeping our stakeholders not just informed but one step ahead as they tackle the latest developments in California water.

Resolution #4: Decisions will be made, and projects built to improve water resiliency BEFORE disaster hits.

The disasters of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and Hurricane Sandy in 2012 were a wake-up call to Californians working on the state’s water issues. The costliest and third-costliest natural disasters in U.S. history, these two hurricanes reminded us of the fragility of our own state water infrastructure from our more likely risks of earthquakes and sea level rise. For example, we know that a big earthquake could have a big impact on our state’s water supply. According to UCLA Professor Jon Stewart, the three main water systems that bring water to Southern California each cross the San Andreas Fault at least once. This means that should the “big one” hit along that fault line, Southern California’s imported water supply from the Colorado River Aqueduct, the Los Angeles Aqueduct and the State Water Project could be severely impacted. This is especially significant for the State Water Project. 

About a third of Southern California’s water supply depends on water transported through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Islands in the Delta are protected by 100-year-old levees. Those levees are not likely to survive a major earthquake. Should these levees collapse, saltwater from San Francisco Bay would rush inland, and render water supplies too salty. That could interrupt service to millions of people, farms and businesses. It’s a known risk, and efforts to address it have been underway for years by people across the state. Planning for modernization of this critical statewide water system is underway with the ongoing environmental review of the Delta Conveyance project. We need to do everything we can to keep this important project progressing, along with simultaneous efforts to increase local supplies. Many successful collaborations are triggered by crisis. Let’s create our collaboration before that happens.

Resolution #5: Help create informed consensus about economic feasibility of water projects and policy.

Facts matter. We will continue to work with elected officials, policy makers and leaders to develop and support water projects and policies based on sound science and verifiable facts rather than more political motivations. For example, finding ways to address emerging contaminants in water must be done with an eye toward solutions that take into account the challenges and perspectives of both large and small water systems in meeting safe drinking water standards.

Resolution #6: Water managers in California will voluntarily agree to work together.

Smart, adaptive and real-time management of water resources is best achieved by those parties with the most at stake. That’s why we urge collaboration between state, federal and local water agencies in managing water resources and planning for the future. Successful voluntary agreements hold the key to improving conditions for fish and wildlife while ensuring water flows to the people and the economies that depend on it. We take heart and hope to follow the example of collaborative success stories such as those pointed out by Quinn during his June address to our organization: the San Gabriel and Santa Ana River watersheds, both of which demonstrated a decades-long transition from adversarialism to successful collaboration. The Butte Creek Salmon Restoration Project, the Yuba River Accord, the Lower Colorado River Multispecies Conservation Plan, and the Battle Creek Restoration Project are other instances. Let us allow these examples to assure us that more can be done if we get the right people around the table. 

The post 6 New Year’s Resolutions for SCWC in 2021 appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

The post Blog: Coronavirus and Your Water appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.

The Water Quality Task Force of the Southern California Water Coalition issued its position statement on economic feasibility guidance for maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) to E. Joaquin Esquivel, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board on March 2, 2019. The position statement outlines what the work group believes to be the best approach to quantify and compare the relative economic feasibility of potential alternative MCLs.

An excerpt from the position paper reads: 

“A rigorous, scientific and best practices approach to evaluation of economic feasibility for proposed MCLs that is consistent with both applicable laws and past practice will provide concrete benefits to the public, the State Water Resources Control Board and water utilities. Such an approach should ensure that available system and rate payer resources are invested in MCLs that maximize risk reduction and public health benefits. It should also provide greater water rate affordability and stability for low- and fixed-income ratepayers and greater certainty for water systems facing future compliance obligations. Finally, it should prompt more effective risk communication, which will in turn enhance public confidence in the safety of drinking water throughout the state.”

Read the cover letter to the State Water Resources Control Board

Read the position paper on economic feasibility guidance for maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)

The post Water Quality: Statement on Economic Feasibility for Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) appeared first on Southern California Water Coalition.